Your vote: the most important Jews in American history

pf button both Your vote: the most important Jews in American history

460px Albert Einstein Head Your vote: the most important Jews in American historyThe National Museum of American Jewish History in Philadelphia has announced an elaborate poll on their website to determine the identity of 18 of the most important and remarkable Jews in America for an upcoming exhibit on the Philadelphia Mall. The exhibit will be called “Only in America” and will, according to the Museum, “illustrate the choices, challenges and opportunities a select few individuals encountered on their pathways to remarkable achievement.”

I dare you to try to vote in this narrowing of unbelievable Jewish folk.

You pick 24 Jews, or 3 per category, out of a total of 218 Jews. Here are the categories: Sports, Science and Medicine, Religion and Thought, Arts and Entertainment, Business and Philanthropy, Literature, Performance and Politics, Law and Activism. Oh, and in case you think your choice is not too difficult already, you can “write in” votes for famous Jews that you think the Museum forgot to account for.

Your deadline is today, August 6th. Go vote and may the best Jew win.

(Photo of Albert Einstein: Wikimedia Commons)

Filed Under: What's Nu?

Tags: , , ,

About the Author

Leora Maccabee Itman is the President of Jewfolk Media, Inc. and Editor in Chief of TCJewfolk.com. She grew up benefiting from many great Twin Cities Jewish institutions, and is thrilled to use this blog to give back to the community that is such a strong part of her identity. Leora is an attorney at Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand LLP. Contact her at Leora@tcjewfolk.com.

Comments (3)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. ML says:

    This was interesting but far too short on female choices.

  2. Really interesting point Matt. Why do you think there are so few women listed? Because there aren’t enough Jewish women to list in the fields or because of a lack of knowledge by the museum exhibition’s organizers?

  3. ML says:

    Both. Neither. Reason C. Some fields could have easily had more female choices, others not so, mostly because of past restrictions or inhibitions. I guess they could be praised for not including fringe females solely to appear PC, but that’s rarely a sole motivation.

Leave a Reply




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.