This is a guest post by Evan Stern, an author, advocate and consultant with deep twin cities roots. He is secretary of the local Hillel Foundation Board of Directors and is active with Temple Israel and the Minneapolis Jewish Federation.
“We are passionately and unapologetically pro-Israel. That is our first principle…Israel supporters have not only the right, but the obligation to speak out when we think that the policies or actions of the Israeli government are hurting Israel or harming the long term interests of the Jewish people. We do not revel in criticizing Israel, we do it with a heavy heart.”
–Jeremy Ben-Ami, President of J Street.
I recently returned from J Street’s second annual conference in Washington, DC. The “Giving Voice to Our Values” conference was exciting, inspiring and ultimately quite empowering. It was also invigorating to play an active role in an organization that is still congealing into a solid state. Less than three years old, J Street is wrestling with the question of how to cast a broad tent without alienating the moderate mainstream. In breakout sessions and impassioned conversations over meals, one could actually feel J Street continually shaping its direction, strategy and character.
This complicated question was on full display during one of the sessions I attended, “The Campus Challenge: Changing the Conversation in an Environment of Extreme Polarization.” Nearly all of the follow-up questions from the crowd focused on how organizations like Hillel and J Street U can foster open, pluralistic debate without compromising J Street’s mainstream appeal. Campus professionals and student leaders spoke about their experiences in polarized environments that often make balanced or nuanced discourse almost impossible. It was so powerful hearing from students who courageously stood in the lonely center of the debate, making it that much easier for other reasonable, nuanced thinkers to discuss solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian stalemate.
Even more inspiring were some of the major speakers and plenary participants at the conference. Rachel Lerner, the Vice President of J Street’s Educational Fund, kicked off the event with this reminder: “The Jewish Community has more to say than the institutions who claim to represent us.” Rabbi David Saperstein added, “J Street’s pro-Israel, pro-peace vision is right. It is needed now more than ever, go forward with courage.”
Dr. Izzeldin Abuelaish, a Gazan who lost three daughters and a niece during Operation Cast Lead, was honored for transcending his epic loss into a poignant message of peace and reconciliation. “Our enemies are greed, ignorance and that we don’t know each other,” said Dr. Abuelaish, who received thunderous applause when he asserted that being genuinely pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian are one and the same.
Speakers like these brought me to my feet, moved me to tweet up a storm (@Jewinspace), and deeply resonated with my progressive Jewish values. This excitement was compounded by the sheer size of the conference. Over 2400 J Streeters attended, with more than 500 students from 128 universities. Minnesota alone brought almost thirty people to the conference. Six of us participated in J Street’s day on the hill, a coordinated effort of hundreds of local activists lobbying more than 225 congressional offices.
We met with Senators Amy Klobucher and Al Franken, as well as Congresspeople Keith Ellison, Betty McCollum and Tim Walz. In preparing for these meetings, we worked closely with J Street staff to discuss the goals and methods of this kind of direct democratic participation. The actual meetings were incredibly moving, as representative after representative reiterated deep desires for peace and a sustainable solution for both the Israelis and the Palestinians. The understood the critical importance of continued foreign aid to both Israel and the Palestinian Authority, the specific political “ask” our group made of each representative. (Click here to read the letter to President Obama from Congresswomen Jan Schakowsky and Anna Eshoo.)
Politics are tricky. As California Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey said during a panel discussion, on Middle East issues “the most important decisions are governed by fear; fear of losing votes, of losing campaign donations.” Which is why the widespread presence of J Street members in congressional offices was critically important: We demonstrated that thriving constituencies all across the country believe in J Street’s mission and are dedicated to urgent US diplomatic leadership in bringing about a sustainable two-state solution.
Keith Ellison, who spoke at the conference and is a J Street endorsed candidate, strongly encouraged us to continue polling the Jewish American electorate. In its November 2010 poll, J Street found that 83% of American Jews want the U.S. Government to play “an active role in helping the parties to resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict.” A slightly smaller majority, 71% said they would still support active U.S. leadership if it meant “publicly stating its disagreements” with both Israelis and Arabs. This is a startling statistic given the self-censorship of traditional pro-Israel advocates when it comes to criticism of Israel.
Perhaps the most interesting of all was the gap between the percent of American Jews who agree with the President’s policies when asked about his handling of the conflict, and the percent who said the “like the way he is executing these policies.” While 71% agree with the policies, only 33% like the execution of these policies.
That discrepancy between the language of the administration and the actions on its part was widely echoed among conference attendees. We even heard it from members of congress. The consensus was that President Obama can only impact things when he goes to Israel and makes a literally and figuratively strong statement to both parties. As conference panelist and New York Times columnist Roger Cohen wrote on March 4, just days after the conference, “Go to Jerusalem, Mr. President.”
In my opinion, we all need to go to Jerusalem. After three days of passionate speeches, dialogue and debate, I miss the land of milk and honey more than ever. I am determined to get back as soon as I can, but in the meantime, I intend on summoning up the spirit of the holy land by engaging friends, family and community members in local J Street efforts here in Minnesota. In his letter to conference participants, President Shimon Peres wrote “This is a tumultuous time, but it is also a time of opportunity.”
In her letter, opposition leader and Kadimah Party Head Tzipi Livni wrote, “I believe that Jews in Israel and around the world share a common commitment to ensuring Israel’s future as a vibrant Jewish and democratic State, secure and at peace with its neighbors.” We in the diaspora have a crucial role to play, and J Street is at the forefront of the progressive wave merging our policies with our values.
The name of the author is omitted. An unfortunate oversight?
@Dmitry – It was indeed a mistake caused by a technical glitch. We’ve updated the piece to include Evan Stern’s bio.
This is an inspiring video of interviews with J Street conference attendees…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ll0_DVR8pXM&feature=player_embedded#at=76
Maybe in Doublespeak,or on another planet,
supporting the boycott, divestment
and sanctions campaign against Israel translates as being
“pro-Israel”?
Members also believe both the IDF and Hamas are terrorists… ouch
and would like to see J Street embrace more of the language of “the radical left”…
I suppose that means terms like, “apartheid”? oppressed? occupied? massacre? genocide? language the “radical left” adopted straight from the Arab narrative aka
propaganda,vilifying Jews as colonial European invaders and, comparing Jews to Nazis, Gaza to Warsaw,and need I go on? Language that only further polarizes the issue, the opposite of what the author of this article claims J Street wants to achieve.
I also have to question the veracity of J Street as a seemingly populist movement… after evading, even lying about,who their main funders were.
I think young people especially are excited about being part of some movement… especially today… it’s easy to get caught up in the excitement of change without knowing exactly where one is going… and with whom.
In the write up above I do feel the mounting sense of
excitement as the author reports on their growing numbers and their spread of influence and lobbying those of influence, speaking only vaguely of mission, not
fully telling us just what exactly they are lobbying for…? Are they lobbying for boycott/divestment/sanctions against Israel? Or should we just dismiss such elephants in the room and join the parade?
Check out the most recent American Jewish World (paper version) for a very different view of the J Street conference.
Cheryl,
Part of J Street’s mission is to ensure a broad dialogue among supporters of Israel, including those with whom we disagree. Even though J Street strongly opposes the BDS movement, we still feel it is wrong to exclude those on our left who support BDS and those to our right who support a moving away from a democratic state…Don’t take a video of four (out of over 2000) conference attendees as representative of the entire organization. In fact, two of the interviewees have already spoken out and said that their quotes were misrepresented and drastically taken out of context. You can get a much more accurate portrait of J Street and its conference attendees here (scroll down on the right-hand side for more interviews): http://www.youtube.com/user/jewcytv#p/u/4/s97nJFhHVos or by reading J Street’s actual positions: http://jstreet.org/policy/issues/
With regards to lobbying, my summary actually states exactly what we pushed for: “The critical importance of continued foreign aid to both Israel and the Palestinian Authority.” We don’t advocate for divestment–quite the opposite. I encourage you to read the specific letter to President Obama from representatives Jan Schakowsky and Anna Eshoo that we brought to each member of congress. There is a clearly labeled link to the letter in the above text.
In terms of where J Street is going, the answer would be “forward, and quickly.” Preserving the status quo is not serving anyone’s interest. J Street is successful because it advocates for urgent US action to help end the Israeli-Palestinian stalemate. Young people are excited about being a part of this movement because it speaks to our progressive values and carries the virtues of real and lasting change.
J Street supporters stand shoulder to shoulder with the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions crowd on College Campuses on the East Coast Universities I have been to. It is shocking to me for Mr. Ben Ami to publicly pronounce that he is so pro-Israel when in fact J Street is absolutely hard core anti-Zionist. Most J Street supporters I have met are as anti-Zionist as Hamas and PLO supporters. They may be Jewish but they certainly do not support Israel in any way, shape or form. I urge the author of this story to go out and visit College Campuses and see J Street supporters in action. Shocking.
Evan… appreciate your comments…
I can accept that the 7 people interviewed may not be “representative” of J Street’s (current) platform… just coincidence that the videographer happened to find 7 out of 2,400 attendees who hold these particular views… but it suspends belief that these comments were “taken out of context”…
In growing their numbers, I think we can agree that J Street appeals particularly to youth and those on the radical left who espouse views like the 7 on the video.
In signing on to organizations, it’s important to know how they began and where they are going to. While portraying itself as a populist movement, J Street was started largely through funding from George Soros… which they got caught lying about. So it’s logical one should have a healthy sense of skeptism… and natural to wonder if the J Streeters interviewed just might indicate where this street leads to…
Here are the facts. J Street opposes BDS (http://jstreet.org/policy/issues/the-boycott-divestment-sanctions-movement/) and I encourage everyone to actually read J Street’s policy positions here (http://jstreet.org/policy/issues/).
These are the words of Tzipi Livni, in her letter lauding the conference:
“The discussion within the pro Israel community about how best to advance this goal should be based on respecting differing opinions that are motivated by love and commitment to Israel’s security and its future. While we may sometimes disagree, what unites us as a people must always be greater than the viewpoints that separate us.”
J Street’s mission, you point out, “is to ensure a broad dialogue among supporters of Israel”… but it seems more like J Street may actually be promoting a particular pov…
as per a Jerusalem Post editorial, invited J-Street conference speakers included Rebecca Vilkomerson, executive director of Jewish Voice for Peace and a fervent proponent of Boycotts, Divestments and Sanctions against Israel; Mustafa Barghouti, leader of the Palestinian National Initiative, and another BDS advocate who took part in the Free Gaza Flotilla…